Skip to main content
Prompt:
Schedule a meeting with the dog walker on Thursday April 24th at 2pm in Madison Square Park.
Event Structure:
  • Summary: Meeting with dog walker
  • Start: 2025-04-24T14:00:00
  • End: 2025-04-24T14:30:00
  • Location: Madison Square Park
  • Description: (optional)
  • UID: dog_walker_20250424@memorysystem.ai

2. Reschedule Event

Prompt: Move my yoga class on Thursday from 5:30pm to 7:30pm. Event Structure (update):

3. Delete Event

Prompt: Cancel the all-team meeting on Wednesday at 2pm. Agent Task:
  • Locate event by summary + timestamp
  • Delete via Calendar API using UID

4. Add Recurring Event

Prompt:
Add a 15-minute check-in with my research assistant every Friday at 10am.
Event Structure:

5. Soft Scheduling / Suggestion

Prompt:
Find 30 minutes tomorrow afternoon for a deep work session.
Agent Task:
  • Parse window: 2025-04-24T13:00:00 to 17:00:00
  • Search for free time slot
  • Add tentative calendar entry

6. Multi-Action Update

Prompt:
Push the chemistry tutoring to Saturday morning and move my call with Alex to Sunday night.
Agent Task:
  • Identify and reschedule two events
  • Event 1:
    • Summary: Chemistry tutoring
    • New Time: 2025-04-26T09:00:00
  • Event 2:
    • Summary: Call with Alex
    • New Time: 2025-04-27T21:00:00

1. Reflects Real Agent Usage

Most meaningful interactions with calendar agents will begin from natural language prompts, not direct .ics inputs or structured tool calls.
  • You’re simulating actual usage patterns: “schedule this”, “move that”, “when is…”
  • It gives you a direct path from interface → intent → execution

2. Tightly Couples Input with Outcome

  • You can easily test whether:
    • The prompt is interpreted correctly
    • The right event is created/modified/deleted
    • The output aligns with expected .ics structure
This makes it ideal for both unit tests and end-to-end agent simulations.

3. Enables Dataset Generation + Fine-tuning

  • You can generate a dataset of (prompt → event structure) pairs
  • Fine-tune or supervise the Cursor Calendar agent with examples like:
    • Input: “Cancel my sync with Max tomorrow”
    • Target JSON: (event details to delete)

4. Gives You Flexibility to Inject Memory

Prompt-centric workflows let you condition agent behavior on prior traces:
  • “Didn’t I already book lunch on Thursday?”
  • “Move that reflection I wrote after the RA meeting”
This ties directly into the MCP memory layer. By grounding your agent in conversational prompts, you:
  • Build a usable interface abstraction
  • Keep your pipeline modular (chat → intent → planning tool → calendar)
  • Allow future agents (Claude, GPT, custom planner) to act through MCP in a consistent way
Develop a lightweight conversation-to-action test harness, where each test includes:
  • user_input: natural language prompt
  • expected_tool_call: e.g., sync_traces_to_google([event])
  • expected_event: minimal structured event block
Use this both for:
  • MCP simulation testing
  • Agent tool call grounding (especially for Cursor/GPT/Claude)
Schedule, reschedule, delete, schedule to a specific calendar, suggested schedule (light), set recurring, end recurring, add collaborator, add location, change location Recall, summarize Retrieve md format for editable interface